Locked History Actions

Diff for "Related Publications"

Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2016-05-30 14:13:32
Size: 1816
Editor: paravengers
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2016-05-30 14:13:49
Size: 1819
Editor: paravengers
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 22: Line 22:
   * Bogus Control Flow (https://github.com/obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator/wiki/Bogus-Control-Flow)Average overhead performance ➡ 28 %
   * Control Flow Flattening (https://github.com/obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator/wiki/Control-Flow-Flattening)Average overhead performance ➡ 860 %
   * Instruction Substitution (https://github.com/obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator/wiki/Instructions-Substitution)Average overhead performance ➡ 13.5 %
   * Bogus Control Flow (https://github.com/obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator/wiki/Bogus-Control-Flow) Average overhead performance ➡ 28 %
   * Control Flow Flattening (https://github.com/obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator/wiki/Control-Flow-Flattening) Average overhead performance ➡ 860 %
   * Instruction Substitution (https://github.com/obfuscator-llvm/obfuscator/wiki/Instructions-Substitution) Average overhead performance ➡ 13.5 %

Implementations of Masking

  • Andrew Moss, Elisabeth Oswald, Dan Page, and Michael Tunstall. Compiler Assisted Masking. In Emmanuel Prouff and Patrick Schaumont, editors, CHES, volume 7428 of LNCS, pages 58–75. Springer, 2012

  • G. Agosta, A. Barenghi, M. Maggi and G. Pelosi, "Compiler-based side channel vulnerability analysis and optimized countermeasures application" Design Automation Conference (DAC), 2013 50th ACM/EDAC/IEEE, Austin, TX, 2013, p. 1-6.

Obfuscation

Model of attacker

In the case of cyber attacks